Comments on: Bristol announced Fighter T is better than Bugatti Veyron

By: Gareth

Gareth — Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:20:30 +0000

I think you should all take note that the artical is in MPH and NOT km/h - just to save you all the time, 270MPH is 435 km/h give or take!

By: Rohn- i know abt cars

Rohn- i know abt cars — Sat, 17 Nov 2007 04:04:32 +0000

k no car is better than the veyron. it goes 407km/h! o and the mclaren… it sucks, it cant even handle the top speen it is supoosed to go at. its engine style is old and so it gets steamed up too fast ( at 200km/h)! have u heard of the HULME F1. I think the porsche carrera gt goes at 330km/h. so this bristol car is a noob.

By: nawar azzawi

nawar azzawi — Sun, 08 Jul 2007 14:57:22 +0000

for me I agree with Mr.A.said??but still there is A little diffrence between these cars & bristol??
the bristol cars designed for (Pilots)??Ay?the others for the rich fucking people?
if you a rich wealty pilot go and by one??because you will never lose the sence of the flying for a second??this car is just like flying the F16 block 60 or the new typhone

By: aleksandar

aleksandar — Wed, 06 Dec 2006 09:19:56 +0000

Looks you fools never heard about McLaren F1 and its 391km/h. Oh don’t belive? Go to official McLarens site and download video and you will se. It can achieve 391 but official speed is 386km/h and it is on the second place after koeniggseg, buggati is not still launched in production. And looks you never heard about Jaguar XJ220 and its 342Km/h . Slr is not built for speed record you stupid people, Pagani zonda too, and at the end where is the Enzo with its 350? You are poor…